Cheap, Coersive Sex is Not a Romantic “Relationship” !!!

The sinister, super persistent, sexual predator, a.k.a. SPenis-loopy Stalkinger, (my moniker for that low-life, sociopathic, slender “she-man” thot —- whose real name shall otherwise, not be spoken — ) loves to equivocate reality with delusional euphemisms that are semantic distortions, or perversions of what the phrase “involved in a romantic relationship” actually means.

She contorts the “meaning of love” to describe her cheap, sexual exploitations of a married man, which constitutes a meretricious association. She has no legally cognizant interests or any recognizable “relationship” with my husband.
But that does not stop her from implying that she was “divorced” from my husband, when her little machinations blew up in her face.

She uses incongruous, entitlement word games to further her lies, deceptions, frauds, subterfuge and her malicious felony crimes committed against my husband, against me, his wife, against the interests of the State of California and against the federal, United States government.

Her unlawful actions and crimes of moral turpitude include, collusion and conspiracy against civil liberties and rights and contempt of court. She and her corrupt lawyer have for improper purposes, or to perpetuate fraud upon the courts, abused numerous court processes and their inherent bureaucratic systems, by employing bad faith and conflictineering tactics, and outright lies and pejoratives to further her rico schemes of blackmail, identy theft frauds, and for its related effective unjust enrichment, extortions.

I’ll never forget the day the pretentious thot brazenly approached me, to tell me that: quote- “she was not going to let my jealousy interfere with her “relationship” with my husband.”

I realize now that appalling and shocking, intimidation tactic was just the tip of the iceberg of her pathetic, mind screwing, gaslighting strategies or games. Or in other words, the vacuous, self-abusing, fantasies of a spurned and vindictive sperm stalker, with no real leverage.

It speaks volumes on her psychology that she feels a need to attack, malign and belittle me. I am such a threat obviously. 😖😖😤😤🤯… BOO !

The only problem with her insinuations of an alleged dating or a romantic relationship, Is that there is no legal “status” or any standing recognized between unmarried persons for any type of family law related litigation purposes. ( Marvin v. Marvin (1979) 18 Cal. 3d 660. )

So No matter how indignantly the unholy, sanctimonious shrew might protest, she is not entitled to any “ family law” hearings for such improper legal considerations.

The purported scandalous associations between two married persons, effectively commiting adultery, has no significance or legal merit.

Does a sexual preditor have a socially recognized or dating relationship with a client, or their assaulted victim ?

Uhh, I don’t think so.

Secretly procuring sperm by stalking the intended married victim is not a recognizable “relationship”, in any ones assessment, except maybe in the mind of a delusional, unhinged from reality, social deviant, despite her histrionic laundry list of exceptions to any moral and legal principles, or of the law.

People who are normal are aghast when I recite the outrageous list of crimes and unlawful acts and moral transgressions, perpetrated against my husband and myself by this crazy and evil sociopath.

But because she wears her snowflake transgressions upon her rose colored-pink vagina hat, her outrageous criminal acts are flagrantly ignored by the obviously hostile to men, #metoo femi-nazi, biased court.

The CA. Family court has in contempt of court, violated due process, by continuously contending to act without any legal power or authority or fundamental jurisdiction. It continues to render legal nullities, “void on its face”, or reliefs that the court has no power to grant. ( see : CA. RULES of COURT, rule 5.17 ; CCP section 128(a)(8); County of San Diego v. Gorham (2010) 186 Cal. App. 4th 1225.)

However, despite our repeated pleas to the court, to do its mandated legal duties to vacate utterly and wholly void orders, or to correct records and to right all the legal wrongdoings and miscarriage of justiice that has resulted from the court’s , “ab initio”, wrongful interventions, the court refuses to do so. Apparently because that would be tantamount to admitting it violated due process and civil rights protections. So it refuses to correct its corrupt, unlawful and void acts.

The Sperm Stalker’s litany of crimes include :

1. The sociopathic targeting of my husband for over 10 years, while she was still married to another apparently cuckold man. She wrongfully and illegally appropriated his protected, aristocratic family names to commit frauds upon the state of California, the U.S. federal government and against the U.S. Social Security Administration.

2. Ingratiating herself to my husband by engaging in corporate espionage to give him access to her competing company’s, corporate secrets.

3. Using her business position as leverage to harrass him by phone and emails, and to justify her stalking of him under the specious cover of business related events. Showing up where she knew he would be working.

Eventually she manipulated him by seducing him, using “love-bombing” tactics and those predatory indiscretions as a means to coerce him into “being her friend and mentor”. She followed him across three continents to justfy her specious claims to others that there was a reciprocal or substantive personal association. Otherwise this type of contacting is known as business networking.

When her company fired her, for her own, poor preformance, she pressured him to give her a job, or else she threatened to ruin his.

4. She fraudulently set up her sperm donor account at the California CryoBank in Palo Alto, CA., by subversively informing the staff, by fraudulent and misleading paperwork, that her known donor partner, was also her husband, “who traveled a lot”, so he was unavailable to sign papers. 😱😷💕💕

5. After her fertility doctors staged an intervention, she stalked my husband down to Malibu, California to cozen or to coerce him under threats, duress and other intimidation tactics to privately act one last time as a known donor.

She claimed that the sperm in the sperm bank was not viable, and thus, if he accepted her indecent proposition, no one would ever know about the actual “method of donation”. 😜😜 😱😱
She extracted this donated sperm, by maliciously lying to him that she would expose his prior sperm donation to his wife, if he did not submit, to in effect sexually assault him by means of rape.

6. At age 37, she got pregnant through this assault, and then gave the hospitial on its pre intake form, the name of my husband, as her legal husband, and then used his social security info, birthdate, etc., so she could, by frauds or her unlawful acts, have his name illegally placed on the California birth certificate. She even falsified her own given names at birth and maiden name.

7. She used this materially false document to commit further ID thefts to acquire a misleading US passport.

8. In 2001, after I discovered the sperm bank hostage holding, she refused to destroy the sperm or to correct the falsified birth certificate unless we paid her an outrageous, extortion fee, demand of $60,000 dollars.

9. For 17 years she has portrayed herself as some poor, abused victim, when it was always her choice to be a go-it-alone babymama. Having no moral scruples, she unconscionably demanded that if the sperm donor did not divorce his family to be with her, he and his inappropriate, and pejorative, old-fat-and-ugly wife would never, EVER, play a role in “her” precious, tyke bomb, child’ s life, born during her valid marriage to another man.

10. She kept this innocent child to herself, with her husband’s full emotional and financial support for the last sixteen or so years. Then, in blatant “collusion with her husband”, she duped the Superior Courts of California, by using the falsified birth certificate, to ask for sole custody, against my husband, not against her husband, the only legally presumed other parent. She repeated misrepresented these material facts to dupe the court , or to knowingly, by unjustified actions, wrongly invoke the court’s specifically limited jurisdiction.

This obviously incompetent, biased and overtly hostile court subsequently justified to itself given the misrepresented circumstances, that it could act beyond its authority and against laws to the contrary, or without any subject matter jurisdiction over the parties presented, to unlawfully violate the civil liberties, privacy interests, rights and other sustantive and due process protections.

The corrupt court never resolved the threshold challenges first, as it is required to do, to establish any “subject matter” jurisdiction, or to determine who actually were the only allowed, proper, required necessary persons who would then be “subject to” its further limited judicial powers. The court did not make the actual required legal status determinations of who were the legal-presumed-natural parents for any bona-fide requests for sole custody orders. Thus, the orders are not binding or are valid, because the husband was never properly joined for the court to obtain persoanl jurisdiction.

Without having any fundamental jurisdiction, all of its ordérs and acts render are #utterly or completely “void””. Or legal nullities that can be ignored.
(See: Rochin v. Pat Johnson Mfg. Co. (1998) 67 Cal. App. 4th, 1228, 1239-1240.)

The court proceeded to act “beyond its authorized authority” to grant reliefs it had no power or rights to grant. Its subsequent orders are null and invalid or “wholly void” on its face. And its deceptive, unauthorized issued “judgment of paternity”, in legal effect, still does not defeat the established marital presumption of paternity that applies.

Because, the undisputed factual findings of the court, as a matter of law, still imply that the only legal father is the mother’s former husband. The joke-em is on her husband. Who is a Stockholm syndrome victim, apparently.

11. After screaming about the wife’s alleged inappropriate concerns, or her legitimate spousal-parental interests about the well-being of “her child”, she hid her locations in California, for years and then ended up in 2014 moving over 4000 miles to live within 30 miles of the wife’s Florida residence and second home without any related documented employment.😱😱😱

This is clear and convincing, proof positive to that this slender stalker is an ongoing threat to our family.

But, the court doesn’t want to pay attention to any of these disturbing acts, showing the conduct of a calculating, social predator or a mentally disturbed personality.

She continues to howl in vitriolic outrage that the evil, inappropriate, and vindictive wife ( who dared to stay with her betrayer husband) has no right to complain about the interloper’s unlawful, criminal felony actions ; nor does the real wife have the right to tell the truth to others about her crimes or replusive wrongdoings, or to demand that the law intervene to hold the criminal accountable.

As of this update, there are several federal investigations of her frauds.

Her crimes constitute violations of Title 18 US Code Sections, 241, 242, 371, 1001, 1028, 1541-1546, ( false statements and deceits to defraud the federal government, to commit identity document and benefit frauds.)

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment


Most people would find it shocking to discover that in California, despite mandatory spousal consent laws and information material for disclosure purposes in conducting transactions that might affect future marital property interests, California CRYO Banks don’t bother to verify the sensitive nature of relationships of known parties to ask them proper consent questions when they broker, as a third party, sperm donation transactions.

I am not discussing anonymous contributions, pay to play deals, where a CRYOBANK tests, screens and resells the sperm for a profit.

I’m talking about the fact that any hustler with a vagina can “open an account” and get an otherwise, emotionally unavailable,  known sperm donor to go in and deposit sperm for her amoral, recreational, reproductive uses without alerting a married donor’s spouse to the suspicious transaction, that could possibly affect her future marital property equity interests.

Apparently in the eyes of altruistic institutions such as CALIFORNIA CRYOBANK, married men own their sperm.  They consider these unique, disposable, tadpole swimmers (gamete substances) to be the “separate property” of a male donor and thus a man does not need to get his wife’s consent to “gift” his sperm away to parties “outside of” the marriage.

But in the reverse situation, women whose positions, which are “similarly situated”, like being “married”  are held to a much stricter standard.  They must get the written consent of their spouse to gift their female gamete substances away.  Even if a woman is not married, but in a relationship with a significant other, she still needs her sexual partner’s consent and written permission to contract out her eggs to another third party.  Women it seems are treated as chattel or second class citizens.  Who do not have the proper sensibilities to control the use of their “separate property” eggs.

You would think with equal protection, due process laws in place… What is good for the GOOSE,  should be good for the GANDER ???

But, OOOpps…. apparently that would be an inappropriate, biased assumption.  Male ducks can be promiscuous as heck, with no accountability.  But let’s see,  Geese ?  Well, gggeeseus ….  they get asked such invasive questions as to “who is their actual goose husband” or “what goose are they regularly shagging or living with ?”   And sorry gals,   but us Cryobanks need to protect our legal behinds and we need that male’s  signature for such a goose-gamete egg transfer.

Back in 2001, when I found out that my ducky husband had been deceitfully manipulated and cozened into acting as a known sperm donor for his sociopathic business “friend”, who was a married woman, I tracked down and called up the mystery sperm bank and was told outright that I had no right, whatsoever to ask any personal questions about my husband’s ejaculation “transaction”.  That, by the way, blatantly violated California marital consent laws.  The bank was appalled at my rightous indignation.  So they characterized my justified alarm and concerns for my interests as being inappropriate, rude and claimed I was unduly aggressive towards their staff. Because I dared to challenge their donor consent policies and to ask personally invasive questions about the sperm recipient.

To conduct a business in California, a business has to follow all of California’s laws.  CA. CryoBank (CCB ) apparently felt certain inconvenient, pesky CA. transaction laws do not apply to their sperm banking operations.

Unfortunately, it took seven more years and a discovery subpoena to finally uncover all the deceptions committed by the unscrupulous sperm recipient. She had fraudulently misrepresented material facts, (like, alleging that my husband was her spouse with a different last name) to open her sperm bank account.  She was maliciously able to do things like this without any proof (-i.e., a marriage certificate) to verify her relationship status in order to skirt legal hurdles.   HER word was good enough for them in their books.

No wonder the sperm bank was so arrogantly hostile to me.  I was cast in the worst of light by the toxic dispersions of an interloper’s smear campaign. Who told the clinic that I was the EX-WIFE, when that was a lie. CCB was covering their legal backside, because they knew they had never bothered to ask my husband  “who he was actually married to” when he filled out their vague information questionnaire.   They just asked him, “if” he was married.   Then he just handed over his little cup, full of SWEDISH SPERM and signed away his rights to the use of his superior “sailors”.  If they had asked relevant consent questions like, …. is this woman opening the account your wife ?….perhaps the sperm bank just might have discovered there was a possible conflict of legal interests and fraud.

Those pesky, investigative, invasions of personal situations are just so inappropriate to ask a man according to the American Society for Reproductive Medicine.   But for a woman, no question or personal detail is beyond scrutiny.  Sperm is just a commodity that ethically blind Sperm-Banks profit from.  So storing coveted sperm for some manipulative, lying hustler was no problem, because the crone paid the bill.

As certain truths game to light that year, my husband asked that the remaining ( supposedly  non-viable) sperm held by CCB be destroyed.  We argued this because the deranged Babymama had by deceits and false promises coerced my husband into donating sperm to her and then later she reneged on all the legal considerations made in order for this suspicious property transfer to have happened.

The indignant babymama refused to close her CCB account and destroy the remaining sperm upon my husband’s requests.  She Challenged both us and the CCB, claiming that my husband’s sperm (acquired by frauds) was her sole, legal property !    

In order to determine who owned the suspect, remaining sperm still in CCB ‘s possession, CCB told us we needed to go to court to litigate the matter.  Forcing us to hire a lawyer to protect our interests in the disputed sperm property, which had been taken hostage and was being held for a $60K ransom by the evil, succubus from HELL.

CCB did agreed to “freeze” the disputed account, because of the woman’s ever growing, outrageous conduct, exposure of her lies, hoaxes and other obvious crimes and deceptions.  Their policies and contract dictated that if the social parasite “was married”, then technically her real husband’s written consent was required to open an account!  Voiding the storage contract.

The petulant shrew threw herself into a fit of indignant rage.  With her twisted, perverted tantrums she decided to show us who had true integrity and who held the moral high ground. Declaring that if we wanted a war, she would gladly wage a WAR on us and our marriage.

She continued her madness by holding my husband’s sperm hostage and for ransom for the next 18 months.  In fact, she threatened him with procreating other unwanted, possible spawns unless he gave into her extortion demands.

In 2008, the sociopathic Stalker submitted colorful pleadings and perjurious declarations to the court to procure inappropriate paternity actions against the sperm donor. She rewrote history and described this prior incident with the California Cryobank (during 2001 to 2003) to the judge as us – contemptuously harassing her, (by us merely hiring a lawyer (in 2002) to deal with her frauds) and perjured documents and lies, – and to mischaracterize our actions as somehow, an aggressive, “vindictive” attack on her dignity and indignant integrity. An unwarranted intrusion on her rights of privacy and liberty rights to create and raise her conceptions as she damn well pleased, without any outsider interferences.

It is a Good thing … Big numbers on lawsuits have a way of humbling the most arrogant !

If ardent feminists want to yell loudly … “Women’s bodies, Women’s choices !!!” … Then how about arguing it should then be a Women’s total responsibility ?

Look,  If some perverted, sperm-stalking psycho-bitch or mentally-deficient harridan wants to gallivant about the streets, being wildly promiscuous and unencumbered by life’s realities and consequences, choosing to have unprotected sex and then later on making the unilateral, one sided choice to bear a child…  then by all means, go ahead with your little vanities, have at it.   But you dear, are on your on.  If you want to play in the big girl leagues, you need to be the one who pays for your absurd indiscretions and choices.

Just don’t ask me ( the betrayed wife) to pay for your adultery, sins or your vain, malicious procreation choices.  Unless you want me to now also play a MOMMY role ?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment