Penisloopy Stalkinger, (my moniker for someone whose name shall not be spoken) loves to use perverted “romantic relationship” euphemisms to describe her exploitive, cheap, past, coercive sexual encounters with my husband, or her toxic, emotional blackmailing for extortion purposes.
I’ll never forget the day she brazenly approached me, and dared to confront me, to tell me that *quote* — “she was not going to let my jealousy interfere with her “relationship” with my husband.”” Such shocking intimidation tactics were just pathetic, sociopathic mind games, or “over my dead body”, delusions and abusive fantasies.
The only problem with the nature of her preposterous, relationship spins are that the law does not recognize such socially insignificant, relationships, or any legal status between them, no matter how much the shrew doth indignantly protest.
What they had is deemed a meretricious, scandalous or in my husband’s view, a business association, regardless of her outrageous, perverted, inversions of the vague meaning of the word, “relationship”. Does a whore or a sexual preditor have a socially recognized or dating relationship with a client or their assaulted victim ? I think not.
Stalking a victim is not a “relationship”, except in the minds of unhinged from reality, histrionic predators, despite her laundry list of exceptions to moral principles and laws to the contrary.
People who are normal are appalled when I recite the litany of unlawful acts and moral transgressions that were perpetrated against my husband by the soerm stalker, which detrimentally affect my vested, marital interests. But this sham, outrageous behavior by her, the court connivingly turned a blind eye to, demonstrating its own subjective prejudice or its inherent bias and conflict of interests.
Her crimes of moral turpitude included :
1. The sociopathic targeting of my husband while she was still married to another man. I assume because she thought my husband was related to an aristocratic, European and wealthy family by his unique surname.
2. Ingratiating herself to him by giving him access to her competing company’s corporate secrets.
3. Using her business position as leverage to harrass him by phone and stalk him under the specious cover of business events. Eventually she seduced himwith her charms and used that predatory indiscretion as ameans to coerce him to ” be her friend and mentor. She followed him across three continents to claim there was a reciprocal or substantive business association. Otherwise known as networking. When her company fired her, for poor preformance, she pressured him to give her a job, or else she threatened to ruin his.
4. When she set up her sperm donor account at the California CryoBank in Palo Alto, CA., she covertly informed the staff by paperwork that her known donor was also her husband, who traveled a lot.
5. After her fertility doctors intervention, she stalked my husband down to Malibu, California to coerce him under threats, duress and other intimidation tactics to privately act one last time as a known donor, because she claimed the sperm in the sperm bank was not viable, and no one would ever know about the actual method of donation. She extracted his donated sperm, by maliciously lying to him to rape or sexually assaulting him.
6. At age 37, after she got pregnant through this assault, she gave the hospitial on its pre intake form, the name of my husband, as her legal husband, and used his social security info, birthdate, etc., so she could by frauds or her unlawful acts, have his name illegally placed on the California birth certificate. She even falsified her own maiden name.
7. She used this materially false document to commit further ID thefts to acquire a misleading US passport.
8. In 2001, after I discovered the sperm bank hostage holding, she refused to destroy the sperm or to correct the falsified birth certificate unless we paid her outrageous, extortion fee, demand of $60,000 dollars.
9. For 17 years she has portrayed herself as some poor, abused victim, when it was her choice to be a go-it-alone-babymama. Who then demanded that if the sperm donor did not divorce his family to be with her, he and his vicious wife would never play a role in “her” precious child’ s life, born during her valid marriage to another man.
10. She kept this innocent child to herself, with her husband’s full emotional and financial support for over eight years. In collusion with her husband, she duped the Superior Court of Alameda county, California, using the falsified birth certificate, to ask for sole custody, by corruptly misrepresenting facts to wrongly invoke its jurisdiction. But, the court never established first, as it is required to do, to determine who was the actual legal father for any precipitous custody orders to be valid.
The court acted beyond its authorized authority to issue an invalid or a “wholly void on its face”– “judgment of paternity”, that in legal effect still does not defeat the established marital presumption of paternity. Because the undisputed factual findings of the court, as a matter of law, imply that the only legal father is the mother’s former husband. Dr. Jokems-on-me Stockholm Syndrome Stalkinger. Thus the legally invalid, “judgment of paternity” merely confirms the sperm donor’s irrelevant, biological connection, it does not give him any “presumed parent status” to be subjected to any further, California family law proceedings.
11. After screaming about my alleged inappropriate concerns, or parental interests about the well being of “her child”, she hid her locations in California, and ended up in 2014 moving to within 30 miles of my Florida residence and second home. Proof that she is a threat to our family.
But let’s not pay attention to any these disturbig acts, showing the conduct of a calculating, social predator or a mentally disturbed personality ….
She continues to howl in outrage that the evil, vindictive wife has no right to protest, or to tell the truth to others about her crimes of moral turpitude, or to demand that the law intervene to hold her accountable, or that the court do its legal duties to compel its agents to correct the fraudulent government documents that subversively and adversely affect my marital interests and privacy rights, or my fundamental due process protections.