Penesloopy Stalkinger, (my moniker for some low-life, sociopathic, skank, whose real name shall not be spoken) loves to use perverted “romantic relationship” euphemisms to describe her cheap, coercive, past, sexual exploitations of my husband to further her sinister frauds and blackmail.
I’ll never forget the day she brazenly approached me, to tell me that: “quote”: — she was not going to let my jealousy interfere with her “relationship” with my husband.” I realize now her shocking, sociopathic, intimidation tactics were just pathetic, mind games. Or in other words, delusional, self-abusing, mistress fantasies.
The only problem with the nature of her preposterous, relationship spins on reality are that the law does not recognize such socially insignificant, so-called “relationship”- associations. There is no legal or actual “status” recognized between them for a cause of action. No matter how indignantly the shrew doth protest that she is entitled to such improper considerations.
A meretricious, or a scandalous association has no legal meaning, regardless of her perverted inversions of the vague meaning of the word, “relationship”. Does a whore or a sexual preditor have a socially recognized or dating relationship with a client, or their assaulted victim ?
I don’t think so.
Stalking a victim is not a “relationship”, except in the mind of an unhinged from reality, histrionic predator, despite her laundry list of exceptions to moral principles and laws to the contrary.
People who are normal are appalled when I recite the litany of unlawful acts and moral transgressions that were perpetrated against my husband by this sperm stalker. Which detrimentally has also affected my vested, constitutionally protected, marital and privacy, liberty rights.
But these outrageous and fraudulent behaviors by her, the court just turned a subjective blind eye to. Demonstrating its own prejudice, or its inherent bias against men in general, regardless of the material facts or circumstances or the blatant conflict of interests.
Her crimes of moral turpitude include :
1. The sociopathic targeting of my husband for over 10 years, while she was still married to another successful man. Apparently she thought my husband was related to a very powerful, aristocratic, wealthy family by his unique, european titled, or noble surname. Which name she wrongfully and illegally appropriated for future frauds upon the Social Security Administration.
2. Ingratiating herself to my husband by engaging in corporate espionage to give him access to her competing company’s, corporate secrets.
3. Using this business positioning as leverage to harrass him by phone and emails and to justify her stalking of him under the specious cover of business related events. Eventually she seduced him, with her love-bombing charms and then used those predatory indiscretions as a means to coerce him into “being her friend and mentor”. She followed him across three continents to claim to others that there was a reciprocal or substantive personal association. Otherwise known as business networking. When her company fired her, for her own, poor preformance, she pressured him to give her a job, or else she threatened to ruin his.
4. When she set up her sperm donor account at the California CryoBank in Palo Alto, CA., she covertly informed the staff by paperwork that her known donor was also her husband, who traveled a lot.
5. After her fertility doctors intervention, she stalked my husband down to Malibu, California to coerce him under threats, duress and other intimidation tactics to privately act one last time as a known donor. She claimed that the sperm in the sperm bank was not viable, and if he accepted her indecent proposition, no one would ever know about the actual method of donation. She extracted this donated sperm, by maliciously lying to him to sexually assault him by effective means of a rape.
6. At age 37, after she got pregnant through this assault, she gave the hospitial on its pre intake form, the name of my husband, as her legal husband, and used his social security info, birthdate, etc., so she could by frauds or her unlawful acts, have his name illegally placed on the California birth certificate. She even falsified her own maiden name.
7. She used this materially false document to commit further ID thefts to acquire a misleading US passport.
8. In 2001, after I discovered the sperm bank hostage holding, she refused to destroy the sperm or to correct the falsified birth certificate unless we paid her outrageous, extortion fee, demand of $60,000 dollars.
9. For 17 years she has portrayed herself as some poor, abused victim, when it was her choice to be a go-it-alone-babymama. Who then demanded that if the sperm donor did not divorce his family to be with her, he and his vicious wife would never play a role in “her” precious child’ s life, born during her valid marriage to another man.
10. She kept this innocent child to herself, with her husband’s full emotional and financial support for over eight years. Then, in blatant “collusion with her husband, she duped the Superior Court of Alameda County, California, by using the falsified birth certificate, to ask for sole custody, corruptly misrepresenting facts to wrongly invoke the court’s preliminary jurisdiction.
But, the court violated due process protections because it never established first, as it is required to do, to determine who were the proper persons subject to its further jurisdiction or to make the actual determinations of who was the legal father for any precipitous custody orders to be valid.
The court proceeded to act beyond its authorized authority to grant reliefs it had no power or rights to grant. Its subsequent orders are null and invalid or “wholly void” on its face. And its deceptive “judgment of paternity”, in legal effect, still does not defeat the established marital presumption of paternity.
Because, the undisputed factual findings of the court, as a matter of law, still imply that the only legal father is the mother’s former husband. Dr. Jokems-on-me, Stockholm Syndrome Stalkinger.
Thus the legally invalid, determination, merely confirms the sperm donor’s irrelevant, biological connection. It does not give him any “presumed parent status” to be subjected to any further, California family law proceedings.
11. After screaming about the wife’s alleged inappropriate concerns, or her legitimate spousal-parental interests about the well-being of “her child”, she hid her locations in California, for years and ended up in 2014 moving over 4000 miles to live within 30 miles of the wife’s Florida residence and second home without any related documented employment.
Proof positive to that she is an ongoing threat to our family.
But, the court doesn’t want to pay attention to any of these disturbing acts, showing the conduct of a calculating, social predator or a mentally disturbed personality.
She continues to howl in outrage that the evil, vindictive wife has no right to protest, her actions or the right to tell the truth to others about her crimes of moral turpitude, or to demand that the law intervene to hold her accountable, or that the court do its legal duties to compel its agents to correct the fraudulent government documents that so subversively and adversely affect my marital interests and privacy rights, or my fundamental due process protections.
Luckily, as if this update, two federal fraud investigations are occurring. Her crimes, constitute violations of Title 18 US Code Sections, 371, 1001, 1028, 1541-1546, ( false statements and deceits to defraud the federal government, to commit identity document and benefit frauds.)