Penis-loopy Stalkinger, (my moniker for that low-life, female sociopathic, marauding, sexual predator, a.k.a. “Metro”Skank#1 — whose otherwise real name shall not be spoken- ) loves to use semantic distortions of perverted “romantic relationship” euphemisms to describe her sinister, but cheap, sexual exploitations of my husband. She uses these word games to deceptively further her lies, frauds, and her felony crimes committed against him, me, the State of California and against the federal, United States government.
Her unlawful actions include abusing numerous court systems, for improper purposes, by bad faith and conflictineering tactics, to further her rico related schemes of blackmail, identy theft frauds and extortion.
I’ll never forget the day she brazenly approached me, to tell me that: “quote”: — she was not going to let my jealousy interfere with her “relationship” with my husband. I realize now that those appalling and shocking, intimidation tactics were just pathetic, delusional mind games. Or in other words, self-abusing, fantasies of a spurned and vindictive sperm stalker.
The only problem with the abhorrent nature of her spins on reality are that the law does not really recognize such socially insignificant, so-called “meretricious associations”.
There is no legal standing recognized between unmarried persons for any type of family law related litigation purposes.
No matter how indignantly the unholy, sanctimonious shrew might protest, otherwise, she is not entitled to any such improper legal considerations.
The purported scandalous associations between persons has no significance or legal merit, regardless of her perverted inversions of the vague meaning of the word, “relationship”.
Does a sexual preditor have a socially recognized or dating relationship with a client, or their assaulted victim ?
Uhh, I don’t think so.
Stalking a victim is not a “relationship”, except in the mind of an unhinged from reality, social deviant, despite her histrionic laundry list of exceptions to any moral and legal principles, or of the law.
People who are normal are aghast when I recite the outrageous list of crimes and unlawful acts and moral transgressions, perpetrated against my husband and myself by this crazy and evil sociopath.
But because she wears her snowflake transgressions upon her rose colored-pink vagina hat, her outrageous criminal acts are flagrantly ignored by the obviously hostile to men, #metoo femi-nazi, biased court.
The CA. Family court has continuously proceeded to act without any legal authority or jurisdiction to do so. It continues to render void on its face, reliefs, that the court has no power to grant. ( see : CA. RULES of COURT, rule 5.17 ; CCP section 128(a)(8).)
However, despite our pleas to the court, to do its legal duties, or to right all the legal wrongdoings and miscarriage of justiice that have transpired in this case, the court refuses to do so, because that would be admitting it violated due process protections. So it refuses to correct its corrupt, unlawful and void acts.
The Sperm Stalker’s litany of crimes of moral turpitude include :
1. The sociopathic targeting of my husband for over 10 years, while she was still married to another cuckold man. She wrongfully and illegally appropriated his protected, aristocratic family names to commit frauds upon the state of California, the U.S. federal government and against the U.S. Social Security Administration.
2. Ingratiating herself to my husband by engaging in corporate espionage to give him access to her competing company’s, corporate secrets.
3. Using her business position as leverage to harrass him by phone and emails, and to justify her stalking of him under the specious cover of business related events. Showing up where she knew he would be working.
Eventually she manipulated him by seducing him, using “love-bombing” tactics and those predatory indiscretions as a means to coerce him into “being her friend and mentor”. She followed him across three continents to justfy her specious claims to others that there was a reciprocal or substantive personal association. Otherwise this type of contacting is known as business networking.
When her company fired her, for her own, poor preformance, she pressured him to give her a job, or else she threatened to ruin his.
4. When she set up her sperm donor account at the California CryoBank in Palo Alto, CA., she subversively informed the staff by fraudulent and misleading paperwork that her known donor was also her husband, “who traveled a lot”, so he was unavailable to sign papers.
5. After her fertility doctors intervention, she stalked my husband down to Malibu, California to coerce him under threats, duress and other intimidation tactics to privately act one last time as a known donor. She claimed that the sperm in the sperm bank was not viable, and if he accepted her indecent proposition, no one would ever know about the actual method of donation. She extracted this donated sperm, by maliciously lying to him to sexually assault him by effective means of a rape.
6. At age 37, after she got pregnant through this assault, she gave the hospitial on its pre intake form, the name of my husband, as her legal husband, and used his social security info, birthdate, etc., so she could by frauds or her unlawful acts, have his name illegally placed on the California birth certificate. She even falsified her own maiden name.
7. She used this materially false document to commit further ID thefts to acquire a misleading US passport.
8. In 2001, after I discovered the sperm bank hostage holding, she refused to destroy the sperm or to correct the falsified birth certificate unless we paid her outrageous, extortion fee, demand of $60,000 dollars.
9. For 17 years she has portrayed herself as some poor, abused victim, when it was her choice to be a go-it-alone-babymama. Who then demanded that if the sperm donor did not divorce his family to be with her, he and his vicious wife would never play a role in “her” precious child’ s life, born during her valid marriage to another man.
10. She kept this innocent child to herself, with her husband’s full emotional and financial support for over eight years. Then, in blatant “collusion with her husband, she duped the Superior Courts of California, by using the falsified birth certificate, to ask for sole custody, —-corruptly misrepresenting facts to wrongly invoke the court’s jurisdiction.
But, the court violated due process protections, because it never established first, as it is required to do, to determine who were the proper persons subject to its further limited jurisdiction, or to make the actual required determinations of who was the legal father for any requested sole custody orders to be valid.
The court proceeded to act beyond its authorized authority to grant reliefs it had no power or rights to grant. Its subsequent orders are null and invalid or “wholly void” on its face. And its deceptive “judgment of paternity”, in legal effect, still does not defeat the established marital presumption of paternity.
Because, the undisputed factual findings of the court, as a matter of law, still imply that the only legal father is the mother’s former husband. Dr. Jokems-on-me, Stockholm Syndrome Stalkinger.
Thus the legally invalid, determination, merely confirms the sperm donor’s irrelevant, biological connection. It does not give him any “presumed parent status” to be subjected to any further, California family law proceedings.
11. After screaming about the wife’s alleged inappropriate concerns, or her legitimate spousal-parental interests about the well-being of “her child”, she hid her locations in California, for years and ended up in 2014 moving over 4000 miles to live within 30 miles of the wife’s Florida residence and second home without any related documented employment.
Proof positive to that she is an ongoing threat to our family.
But, the court doesn’t want to pay attention to any of these disturbing acts, showing the conduct of a calculating, social predator or a mentally disturbed personality.
She continues to howl in outrage that the evil, vindictive wife has no right to protest, her actions or the right to tell the truth to others about her crimes of moral turpitude, or to demand that the law intervene to hold her accountable, or that the court do its legal duties to compel its agents to correct the fraudulent government documents that so subversively and adversely affect my marital interests and privacy rights, or my fundamental due process protections.
Luckily, as if this update, two federal fraud investigations are occurring. Her crimes, constitute violations of Title 18 US Code Sections, 371, 1001, 1028, 1541-1546, ( false statements and deceits to defraud the federal government, to commit identity document and benefit frauds.)