Penisloopy Stalkinger loves to use perverted “romantic relationship” euphemisms to describe her exploitive, cheap, coersive sexual encounters with my husband. I’ll never forget the day she came up to me to tell me that “”she was not going to let my jealousy interfere with her “relationship” with my husband.”” Or her pathetic, sociopathic dreams, delusions and emotionally abusive fantasies.
The only problem with the nature of her spins on reality is that there never was any socially recognized, or any legally recognized, irrelevant, so-called-“relationship” – ever between them, …no matter how much the shrew doth protest.
They had a meretricious, scandalous or business association, regardless of how she perverts and inverts the meaning of the word “RELATIONSHIP”. Does a whore or a sexual preditor have a socially recognized or dating relationship with a client or their assaulted victim ? I think not.
Stalking a victim is not a “relationship”, except in the mind of an unhinged from reality, histrionic predator, despite her laundry list of exceptions to moral principles and other laws to the contrary.
People who are normal are appalled when I recite the litany of unlawful acts and moral transgressions perpetrated against my husband and my marital interests. Which the court connivingly turned a blind eye to, showing its inherent bias.
1. She targeted my husband while married to another man, because she thought he was desended from a noble, aristocratic, and wealthy family.
2. She ingratiated herself to him by giving him access to her company’s corporate secrets.
3. She used this leverage to harrass and stalk him. Eventually she seduced him and used that as a means to coerce him to ” be her friend and mentor .” She followed him across three continents to claim a business association. AKA as networking it. When her company fired her, she pressured him to give her a job or else she would ruin his.
4. When she set up her sperm donor account at the California Cryo Bank in Palo Alto, CA., she covertly informed the staff that her known donor was also “her” husband.
5. After her fertility doctors intervention, she stalked my husband down to Malibu, to coerce him under threats, and duress-intimidation tactics to privately act as a known donor, because the sperm in the sperm bank was not viable. She maliciously extracted his donated sperm, by raping or sexually assaulting him.
6. At age 37, after she got pregnant through this assault, she gave the hospitial on its pre intake form, the name of my husband, as her legal husband, and used his social security info, birthdate, etc., so she could by frauds or her unlawful acts, have his name illegally placed on the California birth certificate. She even falsified her own maiden name.
7. She used this materially false document to commit further ID thefts to acquire a misleading US passport.
8. In 2001, after I discovered the sperm bank hostage holding, she refused to destroy the sperm or to correct the falsified birth certificate unless we paid her outrageous, extortion fee, demand of $60,000 dollars.
9. For 17 years she has portrayed herself as some poor, abused victim, when it was her choice to be a go-it-alone-babymama. Who then demanded that if the sperm donor did not divorce his family to be with her, he and his vicious wife would never play a role in “her” precious child’ s life, born during her valid marriage to another man.
10. She kept this innocent child to herself, with her husband’s full emotional and financial support for over eight years. In collusion with her husband, she duped the Superior Court of Alameda county, California, using the falsified birth certificate, to ask for sole custody, by corruptly misrepresenting facts to wrongly invoke its jurisdiction. But, the court never established first, as it is required to do, to determine who was the actual legal father for any precipitous custody orders to be valid.
The court acted beyond its authorized authority to issue an invalid or a “wholly void on its face”– “judgment of paternity”, that in legal effect still does not defeat the established marital presumption of paternity. Because the undisputed factual findings of the court, as a matter of law, imply that the only legal father is the mother’s former husband. Dr. Jokems-on-me Stockholm Syndrome Stalkinger. Thus the legally invalid, “judgment of paternity” merely confirms the sperm donor’s irrelevant, biological connection, it does not give him any “presumed parent status” to be subjected to any further, California family law proceedings.
11. After screaming about my alleged inappropriate concerns, or parental interests about the well being of “her child”, she hid her locations in California, and ended up in 2014 moving to within 30 miles of my Florida residence and second home. Proof that she is a threat to our family.
But let’s not pay attention to any these disturbing facts….. showing the conduct of a calculating, social predator and mentally disturbed personality ….
Because, a wife has no liberty rights to protest, or to tell the truth, or to demand that the law intervene, or that the court do its legal duties to compel its agents to correct the fraudulent government documents that affect my marital interests and my privacy rights, or my due process protections.