Cheap, Coersive Sex is Not a Romantic “Relationship” !!!

The unscrupulous, conniving and vindictive, “sperm stalker” and her co-conspiring, clucking-hen-house-fantasists delusionally believe that they have made a convincing and compelling legal case by constantly making false material statements, or by alleging outrageous prevarications and lies to the courts.

They have no shame about the Machiavellian nature of their frauds and deceits. “The ends always justifies the means” in their playbook. In fact this sociopath constantly brags openly that she will never make any apologies for who or what she is. She sleeps sound at night, you know, secure in her integrity.

Sounding just like all other notorious, lying, female villians and exploiters.

The biggest fabricated deceit this succubus from hell loves to deliberately misrepresent, even under penalty of perjury-felony, is that while still married to another man, she was simultaneously in a long term “committed relationship” with a different man, my husband.

Which illicit or meretricious type of exploitive association, no one even knew about.

Upon reflection, it seems to me, the only person obsessively “committed” to an unhealthy relationship of stalking and harassing and blackmailing another woman’s husband was the sanctimonious, wicked witch of the west, aka the penisloopy, piece of besmirching schifft.

Her preposterous, ever blame-shifting, semantic mind games are, — while alarming and shocking on its face, — both logistically and onatologically impossible. Furthermore, her fabricated allegations are outright, absolute laughable, absurdities, given that she lived on completely different continents or in separate countries, or in separate states or in separate homes during this alleged, “committed relationship” time frame. And my husband always lived with me, except when he traveled for business purposes.

At least in my humble opinion, I thought I was the only woman married to my husband. Moreover, who in there right mind, “makes it their mission in life” to go around publicly dissing the betrayed wife, while asserting on paper that she is technically, a “committed bigamist” ?

The courts actually made “undisputed findings” to address these non-existing relationship or relative interest claims. Furthermore the record shows it never made any determinations otherwise that could be perversely interpreted, or reasonably deduced into being a recognizable claim that a presumption arose that any sort of cohabitation or socially recognizable relationship ever existed ” between the two unrelated litigants”.

Okay, Okay, to be fair, I admit the findings implicitly prove that my husband did have coerced and exploitive sex with this interloper, under malicious threat of harm to his business and marital interests. She even outright admitted to her brazen acts of premeditated stalking and of her own ## me too- sexual assaults to attempt to get pregnant.

But in the end, the trial court agreed with my husband’s credibility, that he had been effectively targeted, taken advantage of, cozened, coerced, and ultimately blackmailed into acting as a known sperm donor for a woman who repeatedly claimed she was entitled to her “privacy” protections, and marital privileges and immunities to hide the true nature of her salacious procreation activities.

Her narrative is now regurgitated as one of her being wrongly victimized, and of an unforgivable act of betrayal against her. Oddly based on the false premise that the married man would not leave his spouse and children for her, … in spite of his forced sperm donation agreements.

Oh the horror of her insufferable indignations !!! 😱😱😱

In her opinion, her constitutional, liberty and personal interests or her amoral sensibilities have been so horribly aggrieved, that it would be a great social injustice, for her not to be able to abuse the courts to extract some sort of revenge, even through unauthorized legal means.

But legally there is no recognizable harm to her, or a justiciable controversy, nor any legal basis between the two “unrelated individuals” for any court to come to her aid, or to have intervened without provable, just cause. The void acts of the court demonstrated its own bias or corruption, or at best, its own obtuse incompetence, and its utter wholesale violations of substantive due process rights and 14th amendment civil rights violations. Or in other words, “ unwarrented governmental interference” in protected liberty rights and privacy interests.

Her interests, or her “Moonbeam dreams” unfortunately, have no “standing”, or legal status. Nor does she have any legal capacity to sue a man with whom there is no recognizable legal interests. Speculation and conjecture and unproven allegations are not evidence.

For some un-acknowledged reasons the court, without having any authority or jurisdiction to do so, arbitrarily acted, against laws to the contrary. I assume because it wrongly or unfairly wanted to sympathize with her unclean hands. So it bent over backwards, abusing its powers and court process, to bootstap itself into hearing or entertaining her unsubstantiated, incoherent, meritless and conflicting pleadings about non existing controversies.

The acts of the court itself, committed frauds upon the court. The record shows it connived and/or conspired with the sperm stalker to violate all principles of law, all rules of the court, all UPA and UCCJEA statutory jurisdiction prohibitions, to in effect, violate all substantive and constitutional, due process and equal rights protections.

On top of all of these appalling indignities, the low-life thot’s pleadings are littered with equivocations of delusional euphemisms.

She clearly distorts the legal meaning of the phrase— “I was involved in a committed, romantic relationship”. But she doesn’t really know what the concept means, because she only knows how to “use people”, by cheap, sexual exploitation or subterfuge means. No LOVE 💕 or romance or lit 🕯 🕯 candles were involved.

Angry, rejected women, like her, who have to resort to connivingly, stalking married men for their selfish procreative choices, only know how to love themselves.

God only knows how she is going to explain all this to her deceived child.
Oh, forgive me, I do know, … She will lie her ass off to cover up for her unforgiveable crimes of moral turpitude and felony conduct.

“True Love” does not steal or covert or take. Love is not jealousy, nor revenge inspired. “Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud.” It is not rude, it is not self-serving or seeking, it is not easily angered. It keeps no record of wrongs. Love, 💕 does not delight in evil wrongdoings. Love is honest, truthful, and protecting. Love always perseveres.”
Which is exactly the tyoe of relationship that the betrayed wife of the sperm donor still has with her husband of over 35 years.

I’ll never forget the day the pretentious guttersnipe brazenly approached me, to tell me that: quote- “she was not going to let my jealousy interfere with her “relationship” with my husband.” My jealousy ? WTF ?

I realize now that her appalling intimidation tactics were just the tip of the iceberg of the typical anti-social behaviors of female, sociopaths or exploiters. Using unhinged from reality, conflictineering, and “”gaslighting” bully strategies.

It speaks volumes about her psychology that she feels such a compelling need to continually attack, malign and belittle me, the innocent, betrayed wife, in all Her undermining smear and disinformation campaigns.
WOW, I must really rate, as I am such a threat to her obviously otherwise sanctimonious insensibilities. LOL.

Be gone you witch, you never know when a house is going to drop on you. !!!! Tornados, lightning, oh my ! 😱😱🌪🌪🌪🌪🌪🌪⚡️⚡️⚡️⛈💨💨🌫🌫

The purported scandalous and cheap associations between two married persons, who have effectively committed adultery, have no relevance in parentage actions.

Secretly procuring biologically valuable, genetic material or sperm by stalking the intended victim is not a recognizable “relationship”. Not in any one’s rational assessment.

Any review of the legal records clearly shows that the courts acted beyond its limited authority or powers, or without any fundamental jurisdiction over the parties. Thus the rogue courts actions are non binding and “void on its face”. Which means any orders or rulings issued are legal nullities, that are treated with no faith or comity or credit.

The social predator ‘s litany of crimes include:

1. Identification Crimes, frauds and deceits by her illegal misappropriation of my husband’s unique, protected, aristocratic family names to commit government document frauds upon the state of California, as well as against the U.S. federal government, the U.S. Social Security Administration, and US State department.

2. Engaging in corporate espionage to give my husbands company access to her competing company’s, corporate secrets.

3. She used her business position as leverage to harrass him by phone and emails,to justify her stalking of him under the specious cover of business related events. Showing up uninvited at events where she knew he would be working.
When her company fired her, for her own, poor preformance, she pressured him to give her a job, or else she threatened to ruin his.

4. She fraudulently set up her sperm donor account at the California CryoBank in Palo Alto, CA., by subversively informing the staff, by fraudulent and misleading paperwork, that her known donor partner, was also her husband, “who traveled a lot”, so he was unavailable to sign papers. 😱😷💕💕

5. After her fertility doctors staged an intervention, she stalked my husband down to Malibu, California to cozen or to coerce him under threats, duress and other intimidation tactics to privately act one last time as a known donor.

She claimed that the sperm in the sperm bank was not viable, and thus, if he accepted her indecent proposition, no one would ever know about the actual “method of donation”. 😜😜 😱😱
She extracted this donated sperm, by maliciously lying to him that she would expose his prior sperm donation to his wife, if he did not submit, to in effect sexually assault him by means of rape.

6. At age 37, she got pregnant through this assault, and then gave the hospitial on its pre intake form, the name of my husband, as her legal husband, and then used his social security info, birthdate, etc., so she could, by frauds or her unlawful acts, have his name illegally placed on the California birth certificate. She even falsified her own given names at birth and maiden name.

7. She used this materially false document to commit further ID thefts to acquire a misleading US passport.

8. In 2001, after I discovered the sperm bank hostage holding, she refused to destroy the sperm or to correct the falsified birth certificate unless we paid her an outrageous, extortion fee, demand of $60,000 dollars.

9. For the last 18 years she has portrayed herself as some poor, abused victim, when it was always her choice to be a go-it-alone babymama. Having no moral scruples, she unconscionably demanded that if the sperm donor did not divorce his family to be with her, he and his inappropriate, and pejorative, old-fat-and-ugly wife would never, EVER, play a role in “her” precious, timebomb, child’ s life, born during her valid marriage to another man.

10. She kept this innocent child to herself, with her husband’s full emotional and financial support for the last eighteen years. In blatant collusion with her husband.

The undisputed factual findings of the court, as a matter of law, still imply that the only legal father is the mother’s former husband. The joke-em is on her husband. Who is a Stockholm syndrome victim, apparently.

11. After screaming incessantly about the wife’s alleged inappropriate concerns, or about her illegitimate bigamist claims, and inappropriately inquiring about the well-being of “her child”, she hid her whereabouts in California for years to obstruct justice, and then in 2014, covertly moved over 4000 miles to live within 30 something miles of the wife’s southern home.

Now who in your eyes represents the real menace or the clear and present danger ??

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment


Most people would find it shocking to discover that in California, despite mandatory spousal consent laws and information material for disclosure purposes in conducting transactions that might affect future marital property interests, California CRYO Banks don’t bother to verify the sensitive nature of relationships of known parties to ask them proper consent questions when they broker, as a third party, sperm donation transactions.

I am not discussing anonymous contributions, pay to play deals, where a CRYOBANK tests, screens and resells the sperm for a profit.

I’m talking about the fact that any hustler with a vagina can “open an account” and get an otherwise, emotionally unavailable,  known sperm donor to go in and deposit sperm for her amoral, recreational, reproductive uses without alerting a married donor’s spouse to the suspicious transaction, that could possibly affect her future marital property equity interests.

Apparently in the eyes of altruistic institutions such as CALIFORNIA CRYOBANK, married men own their sperm.  They consider these unique, disposable, tadpole swimmers (gamete substances) to be the “separate property” of a male donor and thus a man does not need to get his wife’s consent to “gift” his sperm away to parties “outside of” the marriage.

But in the reverse situation, women whose positions, which are “similarly situated”, like being “married”  are held to a much stricter standard.  They must get the written consent of their spouse to gift their female gamete substances away.  Even if a woman is not married, but in a relationship with a significant other, she still needs her sexual partner’s consent and written permission to contract out her eggs to another third party.  Women it seems are treated as chattel or second class citizens.  Who do not have the proper sensibilities to control the use of their “separate property” eggs.

You would think with equal protection, due process laws in place… What is good for the GOOSE,  should be good for the GANDER ???

But, OOOpps…. apparently that would be an inappropriate, biased assumption.  Male ducks can be promiscuous as heck, with no accountability.  But let’s see,  Geese ?  Well, gggeeseus ….  they get asked such invasive questions as to “who is their actual goose husband” or “what goose are they regularly shagging or living with ?”   And sorry gals,   but us Cryobanks need to protect our legal behinds and we need that male’s  signature for such a goose-gamete egg transfer.

Back in 2001, when I found out that my ducky husband had been deceitfully manipulated and cozened into acting as a known sperm donor for his sociopathic business “friend”, who was a married woman, I tracked down and called up the mystery sperm bank and was told outright that I had no right, whatsoever to ask any personal questions about my husband’s ejaculation “transaction”.  That, by the way, blatantly violated California marital consent laws.  The bank was appalled at my rightous indignation.  So they characterized my justified alarm and concerns for my interests as being inappropriate, rude and claimed I was unduly aggressive towards their staff. Because I dared to challenge their donor consent policies and to ask personally invasive questions about the sperm recipient.

To conduct a business in California, a business has to follow all of California’s laws.  CA. CryoBank (CCB ) apparently felt certain inconvenient, pesky CA. transaction laws do not apply to their sperm banking operations.

Unfortunately, it took seven more years and a discovery subpoena to finally uncover all the deceptions committed by the unscrupulous sperm recipient. She had fraudulently misrepresented material facts, (like, alleging that my husband was her spouse with a different last name) to open her sperm bank account.  She was maliciously able to do things like this without any proof (-i.e., a marriage certificate) to verify her relationship status in order to skirt legal hurdles.   HER word was good enough for them in their books.

No wonder the sperm bank was so arrogantly hostile to me.  I was cast in the worst of light by the toxic dispersions of an interloper’s smear campaign. Who told the clinic that I was the EX-WIFE, when that was a lie. CCB was covering their legal backside, because they knew they had never bothered to ask my husband  “who he was actually married to” when he filled out their vague information questionnaire.   They just asked him, “if” he was married.   Then he just handed over his little cup, full of SWEDISH SPERM and signed away his rights to the use of his superior “sailors”.  If they had asked relevant consent questions like, …. is this woman opening the account your wife ?….perhaps the sperm bank just might have discovered there was a possible conflict of legal interests and fraud.

Those pesky, investigative, invasions of personal situations are just so inappropriate to ask a man according to the American Society for Reproductive Medicine.   But for a woman, no question or personal detail is beyond scrutiny.  Sperm is just a commodity that ethically blind Sperm-Banks profit from.  So storing coveted sperm for some manipulative, lying hustler was no problem, because the crone paid the bill.

As certain truths game to light that year, my husband asked that the remaining ( supposedly  non-viable) sperm held by CCB be destroyed.  We argued this because the deranged Babymama had by deceits and false promises coerced my husband into donating sperm to her and then later she reneged on all the legal considerations made in order for this suspicious property transfer to have happened.

The indignant babymama refused to close her CCB account and destroy the remaining sperm upon my husband’s requests.  She Challenged both us and the CCB, claiming that my husband’s sperm (acquired by frauds) was her sole, legal property !    

In order to determine who owned the suspect, remaining sperm still in CCB ‘s possession, CCB told us we needed to go to court to litigate the matter.  Forcing us to hire a lawyer to protect our interests in the disputed sperm property, which had been taken hostage and was being held for a $60K ransom by the evil, succubus from HELL.

CCB did agreed to “freeze” the disputed account, because of the woman’s ever growing, outrageous conduct, exposure of her lies, hoaxes and other obvious crimes and deceptions.  Their policies and contract dictated that if the social parasite “was married”, then technically her real husband’s written consent was required to open an account!  Voiding the storage contract.

The petulant shrew threw herself into a fit of indignant rage.  With her twisted, perverted tantrums she decided to show us who had true integrity and who held the moral high ground. Declaring that if we wanted a war, she would gladly wage a WAR on us and our marriage.

She continued her madness by holding my husband’s sperm hostage and for ransom for the next 18 months.  In fact, she threatened him with procreating other unwanted, possible spawns unless he gave into her extortion demands.

In 2008, the sociopathic Stalker submitted colorful pleadings and perjurious declarations to the court to procure inappropriate paternity actions against the sperm donor. She rewrote history and described this prior incident with the California Cryobank (during 2001 to 2003) to the judge as us – contemptuously harassing her, (by us merely hiring a lawyer (in 2002) to deal with her frauds) and perjured documents and lies, – and to mischaracterize our actions as somehow, an aggressive, “vindictive” attack on her dignity and indignant integrity. An unwarranted intrusion on her rights of privacy and liberty rights to create and raise her conceptions as she damn well pleased, without any outsider interferences.

It is a Good thing … Big numbers on lawsuits have a way of humbling the most arrogant !

If ardent feminists want to yell loudly … “Women’s bodies, Women’s choices !!!” … Then how about arguing it should then be a Women’s total responsibility ?

Look,  If some perverted, sperm-stalking psycho-bitch or mentally-deficient harridan wants to gallivant about the streets, being wildly promiscuous and unencumbered by life’s realities and consequences, choosing to have unprotected sex and then later on making the unilateral, one sided choice to bear a child…  then by all means, go ahead with your little vanities, have at it.   But you dear, are on your on.  If you want to play in the big girl leagues, you need to be the one who pays for your absurd indiscretions and choices.

Just don’t ask me ( the betrayed wife) to pay for your adultery, sins or your vain, malicious procreation choices.  Unless you want me to now also play a MOMMY role ?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment